Leatherneck Blogger

The Obama Doctrine of Control Through Dissension

leave a comment »

By Jeannie DeAngelis

The  president has more than proven that he is not a uniter.  He is a  committed divider.  Jesus  said, “If a house is divided against itself, that house cannot stand.”   Hence, try as we might, it’s getting harder to ignore what appears to be a  burning desire on Obama’s part to destroy the great and glorious house called  America.

With  an eye toward stepping in and reorganizing everything from our social and  economic structure to the U.S. Constitution, it appears that Obama’s plan to  gain control involves stirring up discord and agitating every area of society to  the point of near-collapse.

Barack  Obama has managed to undermine the nation’s unanimity through the deliberate  fostering of racial, political, religious, and class-based conflict.  In  other words, the President of the United States is actively endeavoring to  community-organize America to death.Chicago-style  troublemaker Barack Obama acquired his skill set while nestled close to the  pedagogical breast of Rules for Radicals author Saul Alinsky.  It  was there that the president was schooled in the fine art of community  organizing, and excelled as a top student.

Alinsky  taught that in order to ‘disorganize the old and organize the new’ one must  “stir up dissatisfaction and discontent” and “agitate to the point of conflict.”  Unfortunately, Alinsky’s instructions are alarmingly similar to the president’s  leadership style.

Undoubtedly,  Obama understands the Alinsky principle that teaches that in order “To organize  a community you must understand that … the word ‘community’ means community of  interests, not physical community.”  That’s why the president  subtly stirs dissension in diverse places.  His method is to  “Pick…freeze…personalize… and polarize” a wide variety of groups,  individuals, and philosophies.

Therefore,  in his unending quest to “fundamentally transform” America, Barack Obama has  stealthily managed to expose many a raw nerve.  Still, rather than make a  blatant attempt to further divide Americans, the president cunningly pokes his  finger into past grievances in hopes of creating festering sores he seems  committed to exacerbating.

Proficient  community organizer that he is, Obama inflames old hurts with veiled suggestions  that incite hostility among  factions, and then uses silence to offer tacit approval of the hate speech  spouted by his allies. Those tried-and-true Alinsky polarizing tactics alienate  those who disagree with Obama’s agenda by portraying whole swathes of Americans  as menaces to a national unity he purports to desire, but continues to  undermine.

Yet  even while employing doublespeak, blithe disregard for the facts, subterfuge,  and occasional impulsivity, the president has been able to project the image to  some of unifier as he carefully manipulates the tools of divisiveness to the  benefit of his long-term agenda.

Obama  darkly suggests that the Catholic Church is the arch enemy of women; Americans  who just want immigration laws to be enforced and the border secured are  dream-destroying xenophobes; excluding Democrat donors, rich people are  portrayed as selfish parasites;  pro-traditional marriage advocates are homophobes; gun owners are a threat to  the safety of every American child, and the antagonistic beat goes  on.

Now,  in what appears to be the next phase, macro acrimony is being perpetrated on an  increasingly micro level.

Based  on his public response, it’s apparent that Barack Obama, just as he did with  Henry Gates, Jr. and Officer Crowley, must have felt that George Zimmerman, an  Hispanic man originally assumed to be white, “acted  stupidly” when defending himself against Trayvon Martin, a black teenager  whom Zimmerman claims was trying to kill him.

America  already knows that Obama believes that “if [he] had a son he’d look like Trayvon  Martin.” That fatherly declaration may have been a foreshadowing of the  president’s attempt to purposely foment racial unrest by dispatching the Department  of Justice’s Community Relations Service to descend on Florida to “work  marches, demonstrations, and rallies related to the shooting and death of an  African-American teen by a neighborhood watch captain.”

And  if that’s not bad enough, the Obama Administration’s “Insider Threat Program” is  now promoting suspicion among federal co-workers by asking colleagues to spy on  and report one another based on criteria that can only be described as wholly  subjective.

Organized  divisiveness masked as an attempt to keep America safe, the program asks federal  employees and contractors to pay  “particular attention to the lifestyles, attitudes and behaviors – like  financial troubles, odd working hours or unexplained travel.”   The stated hope is that co-workers can predict whether “suspicious action” might  indicate that the guy they’ve worked side-by-side with for the last 20 years has  plans to do “harm to the United States.”

As  a result, federal workers have officially been added to a list of potential  threats that already includes pro-life advocates, ex-military, Christians of all  denominations, Tea Party activists, Conservatives, and just about any group on  the planet that is perceived to pose problems for Barack Obama’s progressive vision for an Alinsky-inspired “world not as it  is,” but as he thinks “it should be.”

At  the rate the Obama-instigated dissension is progressing, before long, American  neighborhoods will devolve into combat zones and children will turn in parents  for being enemies of the state. In the meantime, instead of asking the president  about his favorite food, some journalist,  kid or otherwise, should inquire of him how his constant fostering of disunity  helps drive home the point that the state of our union is in  need of stronger alliances?

Nevertheless,  the Bible emphatically states that “A troublemaker plants seeds of strife.” From  the first day he was elected, the president has consistently sown seeds of  strife, and, as a result, it has become clear that Barack Obama is indeed  implementing Alinsky’s strategy on a national level.  Apparently the  president hopes that if he stirs up enough dissension, America’s great and  glorious house will be unable to stand.  Then, it will be on to  the coup de grâce, when Barack Obama finally gets to implement the type of  control he so fervidly desires.

Jeannie  hosts a blog at: www.jeannie-ology.com

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/07/the_obama_doctrine_of_control_through_dissension.html#ixzz2ZA4kM1t6 Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Written by Leatherneck Blogger

August 9, 2013 at 06:00

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: